apifm.blogg.se - Urban plates

McDonald's is multinational and as you say pretty clear-cut. A cheesecake factory may or may not be notable – quite likely not, if it is a local or regional business. Reliability refers to sources being reliable there can certainly be reliable sources talking about non-notable companies or organisations, and being mentioned in a reliable source does not automatically infer notability for the subject. Notability for a company (as Wikipedia defines it) is shown through these means. Regarding notability and reliability, those are not the same thing. Runxctry ( talk) 12:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC) First and foremost, you have twice unilaterally removed notability templates from an article you have created, placed there by other editors – that's not "forbidden" but it is a little peculiar. In the meantime, the conversation on Notability must continue, and obviously not here =) I refer to the widespread knowledge that Wikipedia overly represents some interests and not others eg a great collection of Intel and AMD Processor detail and descriptions, not so much about knitting.

At worst, we are losing some collections of information.

Especially in the absence of judge, jury and executioner on unclear guidelines, ad-hoc posting of Notability templates and deleting of articles can be very demoralizing to new contributors.

I am reminded of Wikipedia's credo to authors to "Be Brave" and allow articles to live on.

It can and arguably SHOULD host cloudsourced articles of notability even to small regional or demographic groups.

It's not Encyclopedia Britannica or World Book, it's WIKIPEDIA.Perhaps it's time for Wikipedia to come into its own.It is actively being discussed on the talk page with recent contributions as of a couple weeks old.Allowing notable-yet-not-notable? This it clearly an ongoing issue or "live discussion". (ie allowing articles even though subject not notable). Yet, there is a section for "exceptions".Let's fold that into the assembly line article." "Oh, McDonald's was the first restaurant to have assembly line and consistent quality. If one removes all "promotional-sounding" verbiage, all you're left with is routine information. For an article to sound notable, it can often sound promotional to the beholder's eye.White - McDonald's? Cheesecake factory? Panera Bread - which isn't even its own company anymore? At the same time, which restaurants should be accepted? The grey area is huge and the black-and-white are quite small.Understood that Wikipedia isn't intended to be some ad hoc database or listing of all restaurants in the world.I initially learned more of this through User:KartikeyaS343 ( talk The reliability guideline seems much more clear and well-defined than the Notability guideline.this is a large, complex, and philosophical issue related to Wikipedia's mission.

I have scanned through the Notability page. contribs) 's comment on Notability after I deleted the deleted the notability tag, apologies.KartikeyaS ( talk) 05:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Notability

Runxctry ( talk) 07:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC) You retained the Market Watch source which is indeed a press release.

Subject merits its own article - all articles are directly about the restaurant beyond a trivial mention.

Independent - presumably the press are not directly affiliated with the restaurant.

Reliable - different 3rd party local, critical, and national sources.

Significant coverage - across multiple sources dating back to 2017.

I have eliminated the notability banner inserted by User:KartikeyaS343 ( talk Runxctry ( talk) 00:20, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Reliable sources I have referenced Panera and Applebee's in an attempt to strike a neutral tone. I am completely unaffiliated with Urban Plates other than being a customer.